Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

What do we already know?

  • If someone sells or rents out a recreational accommodation, it is mandatory to propose an energy label to the buyer / renter and mention this in any advertisements.

  • From 1-1-2024 onwards the Dutch organ ILT will inspect if legislation is complied with.

  • Exceptions are possible, no energylabel is required for i) monuments, ii) detached units with <50m2 usable area, iii) >2 years not in use, iv) units without energy installations and v) units with <4 months usage per year and <25% energy usage compared to a full-year usage scenario.

  • Energylabels must be registered at the online government portal EP-online.

  • Energylabel is at unit level

  • Legislation allows holiday resorts to efficiently label comparable units with same characteristics (based on maps). In other words, units belonging to the same accommdationtype are most likely evaluated and processed in bulk.

  • It refers to Dutch legislation, so this does not apply to units in countries other than NL.

What do we need to answer?

  • How does the evaluation process and its output look in practice? In other words, what does our client receive from evaluators and in which format?

  • Should the obligation to mention energylabels in advertisements be interpreted as mandatory to display on client websites?

  • Can it be expected the energylabel is used for reports / batch update processes etcetera? (Manage prices for units with Energylabel X for instance, or as search criteria on a website)

  • Is there a due date for energylabels?

  • Is it relevant to keep track of energylabel changes other than via the unit_history_log?

  • Is it correct understood (based on Infographic) only label A-G are valid for recreational units? (And A+/A+++++ are only for residential/utility)

(thumbs up) Ready to make it

What are we doing?

Why will a customer want this?

Visualize the solution

Scale and scope

...