Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

\uD83D\uDCCB Overview

Define your project's scope and problem space by following the instructions for the Project Poster Play.

How does this project fit into your broader strategy?

MXTS system should hold all relevant unit details in Content Manager which are relevant to display during the core activity (create / manage / show reservations) via MXTS RM, MXT Web solutions, MXT API or MXT reports

Team

Content Manager, Webmanager, API, Reporting

Project owner

Frank Louwerse

Team members

-

Date

Status

IN PROGRESS

❓ Problem space

Why are we doing this?

It is assumed relevant to have the unit energy label added in the system, so it can be displayed and/or used during the booking process.

How do we judge success?

  • It is possible to configure and change an unit energy label at unit level and via bulk update

  • It is possible to store a PDF at unit level

  • It is possible to fetch unit energy label onto templates

  • It is possible to expose unit energy label at Maxxton Websolutions (Webmanager, MyEnvironment, Owner Portal)

  • It is possible to easy import unit energy labels in bulk for a first time setup

  • It is possible to easily have an overview for which units the energy label is missing

  • Clients are able to populate the system from 1-OCT-23 onwards.

 What are possible solutions?

Most feasible directions to implement the requirement are to:

  • Develop a new field at unit level

  • Develop a new field at accommodationtype level with inheritance to unit level

  • Use amenity at unit level

✅ Validation

What do we already know?

  • If someone sells or rents out a recreational accommodation, it is mandatory to propose an energy label to the buyer / renter and mention this in any advertisements.

  • From 1-1-2024 onwards the Dutch organ ILT will inspect if legislation is complied with.

  • Exceptions are possible, no energylabel is required for i) monuments, ii) detached units with <50m2 usable area, iii) >2 years not in use, iv) units without energy installations and v) units with <4 months usage per year and <25% energy usage compared to a full-year usage scenario.

  • Energylabels must be registered at the online government portal EP-online.

  • Energylabel is at unit level

  • Legislation allows holiday resorts to efficiently label comparable units with same characteristics (based on maps). In other words, units belonging to the same accommdationtype are most likely evaluated and processed in bulk.

  • It refers to Dutch legislation, so this does not apply to units in countries other than NL.

What do we need to answer?

  • How does the evaluation process and its output look in practice? In other words, what does our client receive from evaluators and in which format?

  • Should the obligation to mention energylabels in advertisements be interpreted as mandatory to display on client websites?

  • Can it be expected the energylabel is used for reports / batch update processes etcetera? (Manage prices for units with Energylabel X for instance, or as search criteria on a website)

  • Is there a due date for energylabels?

  • Is it relevant to keep track of energylabel changes other than via the unit_history_log?

(thumbs up) Ready to make it

What are we doing?

Why will a customer want this?

Visualize the solution

Scale and scope

 

\uD83D\uDD17 Reference materials

Government legislation

Government portal for registration by client

  • No labels