Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Once the real costs can be charged, the deposit paid by the owner on forehand should be settled with the costs to be paid. 

A checkbox "Invoice adjustment extra" has been created to be recognised by the settling process. This in combination with the Utility type = admincosts. 


01. Having Utility type = admincost

Not in all databases/concerns, the Utility type  = admincost is available on the Utility bill tab. If not, the Database team has to add this by using a script. (example = 

Jira Legacy
serverMaxxton
columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
serverIda9bb54fe-ddbc-3163-a79c-ef795092530a
keyEPS-1622
)


02. Adjustment invoice extra

An extra should be available where the checkbox "Invoice adjustment extra" has been selected, as well as the checkbox "Allow customization of Name/Price during reservation:".

This extra should have a negative rate, based on the deposit. So if the deposit has a value of €200, the Invoice adjustment extra should have a value of -€200.


03. Link extra to Utility type

On the Utility bill tab, the Invoice adjustment extra has to be linked to the Utility type = admincost.


04. Settle costs including deposit

I have added new meter readings after I have done the above mentioned configuration and generated new invoices again. Now I have chosen Yes for "Do you want to settle the invoice amount with your deposit?".



05. Result of settling the deposit

The newly created reservation 90319001450-004 has a price rule for -€200 for the Deposit, which seems to be expected.

There is also a price rule of €200 for Deposit settle for invoice 90319001450-003. This one is the compensation for the price rule added in 90319001450-003 of -€200.

It seems that this is happening, while reservation 90319001450-003 has not been paid yet.


Image Added

Image Added